Case LawHigh Court › Commissioner Of Income Tax, Udaipur v. M...

Commissioner Of Income Tax, Udaipur v. Mateshwari Indrani Contractors Pvt. Ltd., Udaipur

High Court 20 Mar 2017 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · rhcjodh240618
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax, Udaipur v. Mateshwari Indrani Contractors Pvt. Ltd., Udaipur
Date of order
20 Mar 2017
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income Tax, Udaipur v. Mateshwari Indrani Contractors Pvt. Ltd., Udaipur, the High Court (2017) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: The review petition is dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN ATJODHPUR D.B. Civil Review No. 1 / 2017 Commissioner of Income Tax, Udaipur ----Petitioner Versus Mateshwari Indrani Contractors Pvt. Ltd., Udaipur ----Respondent _____________________________________________________ For Petitioner(s) : Mr. K.K. BissaFor Respondent(s) : -- _____________________________________________________ HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOVIND MATHUR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR Order 20/03/2017 Though this review petition is listed in the category of“Defect” but we have looked into the order dated 23.4.2015,which is sought to be reviewed. Under the order aforesaid, the Income Tax Appeal preferredby the Revenue was dismissed by arriving at the conclusion thatthe same does not involve any substantial question of law. In thereview petition no reason has been given as to why the findingarrived is erroneous to such an extent that may warrant review ofthe order. The review petition is dismissed. (VINIT KUMAR MATHUR)J. (GOVIND MATHUR)J.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan