Case Law › High Court › Commissioner Of Income Tax, Udaipur v. M...

Commissioner Of Income Tax, Udaipur v. M/S P.i. Industries, Udai Sagar Road, Udaipur

High Court 03 Dec 2019 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · rhcjodh240618

Parties

Date of order

03 Dec 2019

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income Tax, Udaipur v. M/S P.i. Industries, Udai Sagar Road, Udaipur, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: The review petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN ATJODHPUR D.B. Civil Review Petition No. 8/2019 Commissioner of Income Tax, Udaipur Versus M/s P.I. Industries, Udai Sagar Road, Udaipur ----Petitioner ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. K.K. Bissa. HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. INDRAJIT MAHANTY HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI 03/12/2019 Order In view of Circular dated 17/2019 (F.No.279/MISC.142/2007-ITJ (PT.)] dated 08.08.2019 issued by the Ministry of Finance,Department of Revenue, Central Board of Direct Taxes,Government of India, New Delhi, as clarified vide communicationdated 20.08.2019, the tax effect involved in the present reviewpetition being less than Rs.1 crore, learned counsel appearing forthe appellant seeks permission to withdraw the review petition. Permission is granted. The review petition is dismissed as withdrawn. (DR. PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI),J (INDRAJIT MAHANTY),CJ 1-a.asopa/-

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.