Commissioner Of Income Tax, Udaipur v. M/S. Vinayak Build Dev. Pvt. Ltd., Udaipur
High Court
07 Jan 2015 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · rhcjodh240618
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax, Udaipur v. M/S. Vinayak Build Dev. Pvt. Ltd., Udaipur
Date of order
07 Jan 2015
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax, Udaipur v. M/S. Vinayak Build Dev. Pvt. Ltd., Udaipur, the High Court (2015) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeal is dismissed accordingly. , J. , J.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
D.B. INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.82/2014
Commissioner of Income Tax, Udaipur Vs.M/s. Vinayak Build Dev. Pvt. Ltd., Udaipur
DATE OF ORDER : 07.1.2015
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOVIND MATHURHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL
Mr. Hargovind Chanda on behalf of Mr. K.K. Bissa, for the appellant
...
This appeal is preferred to question correctness of thejudgment dated 18.11.2013 passed by the learned Income TaxAppellate Tribunal, Jodhpur Bench, Jodhpur rejecting the appealpreferred by the Revenue giving challenge to the order passed bythe learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Udaipur.Suffice to mention that the Assessing Officer found certaindiscrepancies while making a search and seizure in the office of theassessee. The assessee challenged the same by way of filing anappeal before the Commissioner of Income Tax. The Commissionerof Income Tax deleted all the additions made by the AssessingOfficer.
The Revenue assailed correctness of deletion of the additionsso made with assertion that the assessee failed to substantiate itsaccounts by adequate documentary evidence. The learned ITATafter examining all facts of the case arrived at the conclusion thatM/s. Sharma Builders and Shri Lalit Sharma were looking after dayto day affairs of the company and no one from the assessee
company was available at the site at the time of assessmentproceedings conducted. The ITAT also arrived at the conclusionthat the assessee produced various documents in support of itsclaims. The findings arrived by the CIT are pure findings of factsand those do not involve any substantial question of law that maydemand adjudication by this Court.
The appeal is dismissed accordingly.
, J. , J. Sanjay
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.