Commissioner Of Income Tax, Udaipur v. M/S.hindustan Zinc Ltd.(D.b.income Tax Appeal 218/14
High Court
20 May 2016 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · rhcjodh240618
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax, Udaipur v. M/S.hindustan Zinc Ltd.(D.b.income Tax Appeal 218/14
Date of order
20 May 2016
Assessment year(s)
2006-07, 2005-06
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax, Udaipur v. M/S.hindustan Zinc Ltd.(D.b.income Tax Appeal 218/14, the High Court (2016) allowed the appeal.
Decision: 3.Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed in light of order passed bythis court today in D.B.Income Tax Appeal No.166/14.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, UDAIPUR VS. M/S.HINDUSTAN ZINC LTD.(D.B.INCOME TAX APPEAL 218/14)
Dated:- 20.5.16.
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SANGEET LODHAHON'BLE MR.JUSTICE KAILASH CHANDRA SHARMA
Mr.K.K.Bissa, for the appellant.
1.This appeal is directed against order dated 29.4.14 of theIncome Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Jodhpur Bench, Jodhpur,whereby the Cross Objection filed by the assessee in the appealpreferred by the Revenue against the order dated 28.3.13, has beenallowed and while striking down the re-assessment proceedingsinitiated by the Assessing Officer (AO) for the assessment year 2006-07, on the change of opinion, the appeal preferred by the Revenue hasbeen dismissed as having become infructuous.
2.The appeal preferred by the Revenue being No.166/14 relatingto the assessment year 2005-06 involving identical question has beendismissed by this court today and therefore, for the parity of reasons,this appeal also deserves to be dismissed.
3.Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed in light of order passed bythis court today in D.B.Income Tax Appeal No.166/14.
(KAILASH CHANDRA SHARMA),J. (SANGEET LODHA),J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.