Case Law › High Court › Commissioner Of Income Tax, Udaipur v. S...

Commissioner Of Income Tax, Udaipur v. Shree Rajasthan. Syntex Ltd., Srsl House, Pulla, Bhuwana Road,Udaipur (Raj

High Court 27 Aug 2019 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · rhcjodh240618

Parties

Date of order

27 Aug 2019

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income Tax, Udaipur v. Shree Rajasthan. Syntex Ltd., Srsl House, Pulla, Bhuwana Road,Udaipur (Raj, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: The appeals are dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN ATJODHPUR D.B. Income Tax Appeal No. 191/2014 Commissioner of Income Tax, Udaipur ----Appellant Versus Shree Rajasthan. Syntex Ltd., SRSL House, Pulla, Bhuwana Road,Udaipur (Raj.) ----Respondent Connected With Commissioner of Income Tax, Udaipur ----Appellant Versus M/s Minpro Industries, Noble House, Swaroop Sagar Road, Udaipur(Raj.) ----Respondent For Appellant(s) : Mr. K.K. BissaFor Respondent(s):Mr. Mahesh GehlotMr. Anjay Kothari HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANGEET LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.K. LOHRAOrder 27/08/2019 In view of Circular No.17/2019 [F.No.279/MISC.142/2007-ITJ(PT.)] dated 08.08.2019 issued by the Ministry of Finance, Departmentof Revenue, Central Board of Direct Taxes, Government of India, NewDelhi, as clarified vide communication dated 20.08.2019, the tax effectinvolved in the present appeals being less than Rs.1 crore, learnedcounsel appearing for the appellant seeks permission to withdraw theseappeals. Permission is granted. The appeals are dismissed as withdrawn. (P.K. LOHRA),J (SANGEET LODHA),J T.Singh/-

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.