Case LawHigh Court › Commissioner Of Income Tax, Udaipur v. S...

Commissioner Of Income Tax, Udaipur v. Shri Navneet Singh Arora

High Court 07 Apr 2017 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · rhcjodh240618
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax, Udaipur v. Shri Navneet Singh Arora
Date of order
07 Apr 2017
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income Tax, Udaipur v. Shri Navneet Singh Arora, the High Court (2017) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN ATJODHPUR D.B. Misc. Application No. 114 / 2016 Commissioner of Income Tax, Udaipur ----Petitioner Versus Shri Navneet Singh Arora ----Respondent _____________________________________________________ For Petitioner(s) : Mr. KK BissaFor Respondent(s) : _____________________________________________________ HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOVIND MATHUR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR Order 07/04/2017 An application is preferred to have necessary correction inthe order dated 21.1.2016. By the order aforesaid, D.B. IncomeTax Appeal No.42/2015 was dismissed being having monetaryeffect less than Rs.20 Lacs. In the order aforesaid, the factaforesaid has not been mentioned correctly. We deem itappropriate to accept this application. Accordingly, the same isallowed. Necessary correction in the original order itself is madeby hand with red ink. A certified copy afresh be given to learnedcounsel for the appellant. (VINIT KUMAR MATHUR)J. (GOVIND MATHUR)J.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan