Commissioner Of Income Tax-V v. Gujarat Information Technology Fund
High Court
09 Oct 2018 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax-V v. Gujarat Information Technology Fund
Date of order
09 Oct 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax-V v. Gujarat Information Technology Fund, the High Court (2018) decided the matter.
Decision: Tax Appeals are disposed of accordingly.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
C/TAXAP/1467/2011 ORDER
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/TAX APPEAL NO. 1467 of 2011With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 1238 of 2014With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 1468 of 2011With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 179 of 2018With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 186 of 2012With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 478 of 2014With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 516 of 2013With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 532 of 2015With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 576 of 2015With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 651 of 2015With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 715 of 2018With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 750 of 2016With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 837 of 2014With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 83 of 2012With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 8 of 2012
==========================================================
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-VVersus
GUJARAT INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY FUND
==========================================================
Appearance:
MRS MAUNA M BHATT(174) for the PETITIONER(s) No. 1MR B S SOPARKAR, MR MANISH J SHAH, MR RK PATEL, MR SN DIVATIA, MS VAIBHAVI K PARIKH for the RESPONDENTS
==========================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHIandHONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.N. KARIA
Date : 09/10/2018
ORAL ORDER
(PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI)
Learned advocate Mrs. Bhatt, under instructions from the department, sought permission to withdraw these appeals since the tax effect involved in these appeals is below the minimum threshold limit provided by CBDT in its circular dated 11.07.2018 enabling the department to prefer and maintain appeals before the High Court. Permission is granted. Tax Appeals are disposed of accordingly.
(AKIL KURESHI, J)
Raghu
(B.N. KARIA, J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.