Commissioner Of Income Tax-V v. Jalpa Specific Family Trust
High Court
14 Dec 2021 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax-V v. Jalpa Specific Family Trust
Date of order
14 Dec 2021
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax-V v. Jalpa Specific Family Trust, the High Court (2021) decided the matter.
Decision: 5.Present Tax Appeal is disposed of aswithdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABADR/TAX APPEAL NO. 221 of 2010
==========================================================
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-V VersusJALPA SPECIFIC FAMILY TRUST
==========================================================
Appearance:M R BHATT & CO.(5953) for the Appellant(s) No. 1MR BANDISH SOPARKAR WITH MRS SWATI SOPARKAR(870) for the Opponent(s) No. 1
==========================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE SONIA GOKANIandHONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE NISHA M. THAKOREDate : 14/12/2021ORAL ORDER
(PER : HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE SONIA GOKANI)
1.
This appeal had been admitted for
consideration of following substantial
questions of law on 09.05.2011:
“Whether the Appellate Tribunal is right in law and onfacts in holding that the assessee earned long termcapital gains on sale of warrants and not short termcapital gains on sale of shares?”
“Whether the Appellate Tribunal’s finding that thetransaction date was 01/04/2000 and not 23/12/2000, isperverse as it does not take into consideration theevidence found during the search?”
2.The communication dated 08.12.2021 from
the office of the learned senior advocate,
Mr.Bhatt indicates that the assessee has
availed the benefit under the Direct Tax
Vivad se Vishwas Act, 2020 by filing the
application under Form-3 and Form-4 which
depict the payment of taxes. Hence, the
Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-1,
Ahmedabad has requested for withdrawal of theTax Appeal.
3.We have heard the learned senioradvocate, Mr.Bhatt and learned advocate,Mr.Bandish Soparkar.
4.Considering the request of Principal
Commissioner of Income Tax-1, Ahmedabad, the
Tax Appeal is permitted to be withdrawn
without entering into the question of law
which are kept open to be adjudicated inappropriate matter at a future date.
5.Present Tax Appeal is disposed of aswithdrawn.
(SONIA GOKANI, J)
(NISHA M. THAKORE,J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.