Case LawHigh Court › Commissioner Of Income Tax -V v. M/S Pre...

Commissioner Of Income Tax -V v. M/S Premier Exploration Services Pvt.ltd

High Court 25 Nov 2016 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax -V v. M/S Premier Exploration Services Pvt.ltd
Date of order
25 Nov 2016
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income Tax -V v. M/S Premier Exploration Services Pvt.ltd, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Both the application for condonation of delay and the appeal are, therefore, dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

$~2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ITA 753/2016, CM APPL.40357/2016 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -V ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Vikrant A. Maheshwari, proxy for Mr. Dileep Shivpuri, Sr. Standing Counsel. versus M/S PREMIER EXPLORATION SERVICES PVT.LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Ved Jain with Mr. Pranjal Srivastasva, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI % O R D E R 25.11.2016 The present appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act is highly belated - by 586 days. There is hardly any explanation for the delay. The appeal was filed on 23.07.2014 but appears to have been kept objected to. The Income Tax Department does not seem to have any clue about the filing of the appeal or the objections raised by the registry. It refers to the re-organisation of its panel of counsel and cites the pendency of large number of appeals marked defective. The reasons can hardly be considered sufficient cause to condone the delay. Even otherwise, on the merits, the findings with regard to the exclusion of the comparables are based only on the factual appreciation; that does not call for any interference. Both the application for condonation of delay and the appeal are, therefore, dismissed. S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J NOVEMBER 25, 2016/vikas/ NAJMI WAZIRI, J
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan