Case Law › High Court › Commissioner Of Income Tax (Vidarbha), N...

Commissioner Of Income Tax (Vidarbha), Nagpur v. Shri Shyamsunder M. Agrawal, Nagpur

High Court 14 Oct 2010 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · testcase

Parties

Date of order

14 Oct 2010

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income Tax (Vidarbha), Nagpur v. Shri Shyamsunder M. Agrawal, Nagpur, the High Court (2010) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR INCOME TAX REFERENCE No.26 of 2008 (Commissioner of Income Tax (Vidarbha), Nagpur ..vs.. Shri Shyamsunder M. Agrawal, Nagpur) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Office Notes, Office Memoranda ofCoram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Shri Anand Parchure, Advocate for the applicant, CORAM:- J.P. DEVADHAR AND A.B. CHAUDHARI, JJ.DATED :- 14th OCTOBER, 2010 Learned Counsel for the Revenue fairly states that the tax effect involved in this reference is less than the monetary limit prescribed by the CBDT and hence, he is not pressing the reference. Accordingly, the reference is returned unanswered. JUDGE JUDGE

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.