Case LawHigh Court › Commissioner Of Income Tax-Viii Central...

Commissioner Of Income Tax-Viii Central Revenue Building New Delhi v. Anupam Sweets Hs

High Court 08 Feb 2010 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax-Viii Central Revenue Building New Delhi v. Anupam Sweets Hs
Date of order
08 Feb 2010
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income Tax-Viii Central Revenue Building New Delhi v. Anupam Sweets Hs, the High Court (2010) decided the matter.

Issue: Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? .

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on: 08[th] February, 2010 + ITA 216/2009 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-VIII CENTRAL REVENUE BUILDING NEW DELHI ..... Appellant - versus - ANUPAM SWEETS HS-11, KAILASH COLONY NEW DELHI ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellant : Ms Rashmi Chopra For the Respondent : Mr S.R. Wadhwa CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL 1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? . SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J 1.The appeal of the Revenue, being ITA No.220 of 2009, directed against the common order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dated the 31[st] January, 2008 in IT (SS) A No.185/DEL/2006, whereby the Tribunal had dismissed the said appeal of the Revenue by holding that no satisfaction under Section 158 BD of the Income Tax Act, 1961 was recorded by the Assessing Officer having jurisdiction over the searched person, has already been dismissed by us by a separate order of even date. 2.Thus, the present appeal of the Revenue, on the merits of the addition does not survive in view thereof, and is consequently dismissed. SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J FEBRUARY 08, 2010 dn BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J Page 2 of 2
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan