Case LawHigh Court › Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Aakrosh In...

Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Aakrosh Investment And Leasing

High Court 17 Jan 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Aakrosh Investment And Leasing
Date of order
17 Jan 2009
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Aakrosh Investment And Leasing, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Issue: Appeal has been preferred by the Revenue on the following question:- "Whether the loss of Rs.32,37,576/- incurred by the assessee on sale of part B of H series Debentures of M/s.Reliance Ind.Ltd. is a contrived loss and not a genuine loss?" Similar issue had come up for consideration before this Cou...

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
(-1-) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1294 OF 2008 Commissioner of Income Tax.. .....Appellant Vs. Aakrosh Investment and Leasing Pvt. Ltd. ....Respondent Mr.P.S. Sahadevan i/b. Vimal Gupta for the Appellant. Mr. J.D. Mistri with Mr. Raj Darak and Mr. P.C. Tripathi for the respondent. CORAM: F.I. R.S.MOHITE, JJ. DATED: 17th January, 2009 P.C.: P.C.: . Appeal has been preferred by the Revenue on the following question:- "Whether the loss of Rs.32,37,576/- incurred by the assessee on sale of part B of H series Debentures of M/s.Reliance Ind.Ltd. is a contrived loss and not a genuine loss?" Similar issue had come up for consideration before this Court in Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Lazor Syntex Ltd., Income Tax Application No.11 of 1999 which was decided on 11th June, 2007 in which the learned Bench of this Court held that the question of law would not arise considering the discussion in the said order. For the same reasons following the judgment in CIT vs. Lazor Syntex Ltd. the question of law as framed would not arise and consequently Appeal dismissed. (-2-) (R.S.MOHITE, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (R.S.MOHITE, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (R.S.MOHITE, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan