Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Aakrosh Investment And Leasing
High Court
17 Jan 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Aakrosh Investment And Leasing
Date of order
17 Jan 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Aakrosh Investment And Leasing, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Issue: Appeal has been preferred by the Revenue on the following question:- "Whether the loss of Rs.32,37,576/- incurred by the assessee on sale of part B of H series Debentures of M/s.Reliance Ind.Ltd. is a contrived loss and not a genuine loss?" Similar issue had come up for consideration before this Cou...
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
(-1-)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1294 OF 2008
Commissioner of Income Tax.. .....Appellant
Vs.
Aakrosh Investment and Leasing
Pvt. Ltd. ....Respondent
Mr.P.S. Sahadevan i/b. Vimal Gupta for the
Appellant.
Mr. J.D. Mistri with Mr. Raj Darak and Mr. P.C.
Tripathi for the respondent.
CORAM: F.I.
R.S.MOHITE, JJ.
DATED: 17th January, 2009
P.C.:
P.C.:
. Appeal has been preferred by the Revenue on
the following question:-
"Whether the loss of Rs.32,37,576/- incurred
by the assessee on sale of part B of H
series Debentures of M/s.Reliance Ind.Ltd.
is a contrived loss and not a genuine loss?"
Similar issue had come up for consideration before
this Court in Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Lazor
Syntex Ltd., Income Tax Application No.11 of 1999
which was decided on 11th June, 2007 in which the
learned Bench of this Court held that the question
of law would not arise considering the discussion in
the said order. For the same reasons following the
judgment in CIT vs. Lazor Syntex Ltd. the question
of law as framed would not arise and consequently
Appeal dismissed.
(-2-)
(R.S.MOHITE, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.)
(R.S.MOHITE, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.)
(R.S.MOHITE, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.