Case LawHigh Court › Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Ambalal Sa...

Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Ambalal Sarabhai Trust

High Court 26 Jul 1996 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Ambalal Sarabhai Trust
Date of order
26 Jul 1996
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Ambalal Sarabhai Trust, the High Court (1996) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Issue: Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? -------------------------------------------------------------- COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAXVersus AMBALAL SARABHAI TRUST -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR MANISH R BHATT for Petitioner SERVED for Respondent...

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD INCOME TAX REFERENCE No 126 of 1989 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE B.C.PATEL and MR.JUSTICE R.R.JAIN ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? -------------------------------------------------------------- COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAXVersus AMBALAL SARABHAI TRUST -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR MANISH R BHATT for Petitioner SERVED for Respondent No. 1 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE B.C.PATEL and MR.JUSTICE R.R.JAIN Date of decision: 26/07/96 ORAL JUDGEMENT �At the instance of the revenue, following question is referred to this Court for opinion : "Whether the Tribunal is right in law and on facts in allowing deduction in respect of contribution for B.M. Institute amounting to Rs.62,169/- and in directing that exemption u/s. 11 of the Act should be allowed ?" 2.�In view of the decision rendered by this Court in Income Tax Reference No. 161 of 1984 today, this question is required to be answered in favour of the assessee and against the revenue. Accordingly we answer the question with no order as to costs.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan