In Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Ambalal Sarabhai Trust, the High Court (1996) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Issue: Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? -------------------------------------------------------------- COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAXVersus AMBALAL SARABHAI TRUST -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR MANISH R BHATT for Petitioner SERVED for Respondent...
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
INCOME TAX REFERENCE No 126 of 1989
For Approval and Signature:
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE B.C.PATEL and
MR.JUSTICE R.R.JAIN
============================================================
1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed
to see the judgements?
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not?
3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy
of the judgement?
4. Whether this case involves a substantial question
of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution
of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder?
5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge?
-------------------------------------------------------------- COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAXVersus
AMBALAL SARABHAI TRUST -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance:
MR MANISH R BHATT for Petitioner SERVED for Respondent No. 1
--------------------------------------------------------------
CORAM : MR.JUSTICE B.C.PATEL and
MR.JUSTICE R.R.JAIN
Date of decision: 26/07/96
ORAL JUDGEMENT
�At the instance of the revenue, following
question is referred to this Court for opinion :
"Whether the Tribunal is right in law and on
facts in allowing deduction in respect of contribution for B.M. Institute amounting to
Rs.62,169/- and in directing that exemption u/s.
11 of the Act should be allowed ?"
2.�In view of the decision rendered by this Court in Income Tax Reference No. 161 of 1984 today, this question is required to be answered in favour of the assessee and against the revenue. Accordingly we answer the question with no order as to costs.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.