Case Law › High Court › Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Amitabh Ba...

Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Amitabh Bachchan Corporation Ltd

High Court 14 Dec 2009 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

14 Dec 2009

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Amitabh Bachchan Corporation Ltd, the High Court (2009) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

bgp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.1978 OF 2009 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.333 OF 2009 Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Amitabh Bachchan Corporation Ltd. ..Appellant ..Respondent Mr.Yogesh Patki i/b. Mrs.Anamika Malhotra for appellant. Mr.H.Joshi i/b. Mr.A.K.Jasani for respondent. CORAM :- V.C.DAGA & J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ. 14TH DECEMBER,2009 DATE : P.C. 1.Heard. Perused Chamber Summons. 2.By consent of parties, Chamber Summons is made absolute for the reasons stated in the affidavit-in-support of the Chamber Summons. Amendment to be carried out within three weeks from today. Matter to come up on board after four weeks. (J.P.DEVADHAR,J.) (V.C.DAGA,J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.