Case LawHigh Court › Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Amora Chem...

Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Amora Chemicals Pvt. Ltd

High Court 28 Aug 2002 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Amora Chemicals Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
28 Aug 2002
Assessment year(s)
1982-83
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Amora Chemicals Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2002) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Issue: Whether it is to be circulated to the concerned : NO Magistrate/Magistrates,Judge/Judges,Tribunal/Tribunals? @ COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAXVersus AMORA CHEMICALS PVT.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD INCOME TAX REFERENCE No 82 of 1988 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE A.R.DAVE and Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the concerned : NO Magistrate/Magistrates,Judge/Judges,Tribunal/Tribunals? @ COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAXVersus AMORA CHEMICALS PVT. LTD. -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR BB NAIK for the Petitioner MR RK PATEL for the Respondent -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE A.R.DAVE and MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA Date of decision: 28/08/2002 ORAL JUDGEMENT (Per : MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA) �The following question of law has been referred to this Court at the instance of the Commissioner of Income-tax, Baroda, for Assessment Year 1982-83 : "Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the rental income from the Bank of Baroda was taxable under the head "business income" or "income from other sources"?" 2.�It is common ground between the parties that the question is concluded by decision rendered by this Court in I.T.R. No. 79 of 1988 today and, hence, it is not necessary to set out the facts in detail. 3.�The question referred is, therefore, answered in the affirmative, that is, in favour of the assessee and against the revenue. �The reference stands disposed of accordingly with no order as to costs. �����(A.R. Dave, J.) �����(D.A. Mehta, J.) (hn)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan