Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Anand Sarabhai (Hk) Trust N0. 40
High Court
02 Feb 1998 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Anand Sarabhai (Hk) Trust N0. 40
Date of order
02 Feb 1998
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Anand Sarabhai (Hk) Trust N0. 40, the High Court (1998) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Issue: Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? -------------------------------------------------------------- COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Versus ANAND SARABHAI (HK) TRUST N0.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
INCOME TAX REFERENCE No 252 of 1995
For Approval and Signature:
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE R.K.ABICHANDANI and
MR.JUSTICE KUNDAN SINGH
============================================================
1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed
to see the judgements?
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not?
3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy
of the judgement?
4. Whether this case involves a substantial question
of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution
of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder?
5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge?
--------------------------------------------------------------
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
Versus
ANAND SARABHAI (HK) TRUST N0. 40
-------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance:
------------------------------------------------------------ Mr. Pranav G Desai for MR MANISH R BHATT for Petitioner
D.A.Mehta & R K Patel for respondent.
--------------------------------------------------------------
CORAM : MR.JUSTICE R.K.ABICHANDANI and
MR.JUSTICE KUNDAN SINGH
Date of decision: 02/02/98
ORAL JUDGEMENT
��The Income-Tax Appellate Tribunal,
Ahmedabad has referred the following question, under the
provisions of Section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
"Whether the Appellate Tribunal is right in law
and on facts in holding that when the assessee
received shares, debentures and bonds of
amalgamated companies, there was no transfer
under section 2(47) of the Income-tax Act and
consequently no capital gains tax could be
charged ?"
2.��For the reasons given in context of an
identical question referred to this Court in I.T.
Reference No. 221 of 1995, the said question is left
unanswered . The Reference stands disposed of
accordingly with no order as to costs.
���(R.K.Abichandani,J)
���(Kundan Singh,J)
***darji
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.