Case LawHigh Court › Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Anand Sara...

Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Anand Sarabhai (Hk) Trust N0. 40

High Court 02 Feb 1998 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Anand Sarabhai (Hk) Trust N0. 40
Date of order
02 Feb 1998
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Anand Sarabhai (Hk) Trust N0. 40, the High Court (1998) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Issue: Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? -------------------------------------------------------------- COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Versus ANAND SARABHAI (HK) TRUST N0.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD INCOME TAX REFERENCE No 252 of 1995 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE R.K.ABICHANDANI and MR.JUSTICE KUNDAN SINGH ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? -------------------------------------------------------------- COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Versus ANAND SARABHAI (HK) TRUST N0. 40 -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: ------------------------------------------------------------ Mr. Pranav G Desai for MR MANISH R BHATT for Petitioner D.A.Mehta & R K Patel for respondent. -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE R.K.ABICHANDANI and MR.JUSTICE KUNDAN SINGH Date of decision: 02/02/98 ORAL JUDGEMENT ��The Income-Tax Appellate Tribunal, Ahmedabad has referred the following question, under the provisions of Section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. "Whether the Appellate Tribunal is right in law and on facts in holding that when the assessee received shares, debentures and bonds of amalgamated companies, there was no transfer under section 2(47) of the Income-tax Act and consequently no capital gains tax could be charged ?" 2.��For the reasons given in context of an identical question referred to this Court in I.T. Reference No. 221 of 1995, the said question is left unanswered . The Reference stands disposed of accordingly with no order as to costs. ���(R.K.Abichandani,J) ���(Kundan Singh,J) ***darji
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan