Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Anarkali Sarabhai Trust
High Court
02 Feb 1998 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Anarkali Sarabhai Trust
Date of order
02 Feb 1998
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Anarkali Sarabhai Trust, the High Court (1998) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Issue: Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? -------------------------------------------------------------- COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Versus ANARKALI SARABHAI TRUST NO.10 -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: Mr.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
INCOME TAX REFERENCE No 232 of 1995
For Approval and Signature:
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE R.K.ABICHANDANI and
MR.JUSTICE KUNDAN SINGH
============================================================
1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed
to see the judgements?
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not?
3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy
of the judgement?
4. Whether this case involves a substantial question
of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution
of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder?
5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge?
--------------------------------------------------------------
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
Versus
ANARKALI SARABHAI TRUST NO.10
--------------------------------------------------------------
Appearance:
Mr. Pranav G Desai for MR MANISH R BHATT for Petitioner
D.A.Mehta & R K Patel for respondent.
--------------------------------------------------------------
CORAM : MR.JUSTICE R.K.ABICHANDANI and
MR.JUSTICE KUNDAN SINGH
Date of decision: 02/02/98
ORAL JUDGEMENT
��The Income-Tax Appellate Tribunal,
Ahmedabad has referred the following question, under the
provisions of Section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
"Whether , the Appellate Tribunal is right in law
and on facts in holding that when the assessee
received shares, debentures and bonds of amalgamated companies, there was no transfer under section 2(47) of the Income-tax Act and consequently no capital gains tax could be charged ?" 2.��For the reasons given in context of an identical question referred to this Court in I.T. Reference No. 221 of 1995, the said question is left unanswered . The Reference stands disposed of accordingly with no order as to costs.
���(R.K.Abichandani,J)
���(Kundan Singh,J)
***darji
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.