Case LawHigh Court › Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Appearance

Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Appearance

High Court 06 May 1998 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Appearance
Date of order
06 May 1998
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Appearance, the High Court (1998) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD INCOME TAX REFERENCE No 125 of 1995 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE R.K.ABICHANDANI and MR.JUSTICE KUNDAN SINGH ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? -------------------------------------------------------------- COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXVersus MAYUR J JOSHI -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR MANISH R BHATT for Petitioner MR MANISH J SHAH for the Respondent. -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE R.K.ABICHANDANI and MR.JUSTICE KUNDAN SINGH Date of decision: 06/05/98 ORAL JUDGEMENT ��(Per R.K.Abichandani,J) ��The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal has referredthe following question for the opinion of this Court under section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. "Whether the Appellate Tribunal is right in law and on facts in directing the ITO to allow deduction of 40% of incentive bonus towards expenses for earning the same ?" 2.��Similar question had come up for consideration before this Court in ITR No.54 of 1993 with other cognate matters. For the reasons given in our judgment dated 27.4.1998,in the said group of matters, we hold that the Tribunal was right in directing the ITO to allow the deduction of incentive bonus towards expenses for earning the same, but only to the extent of reimbursement of expenses actually incurred upto the maximum limit of 30% of the incentive bonus earned by the assessee. The question is accordingly answered in the affirmative against the revenue and in favour of the assessee. The Reference stands disposed of accordingly with no order as to costs. ���**** ***darji
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan