Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Appearance
High Court
06 May 1998 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Appearance
Date of order
06 May 1998
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Appearance, the High Court (1998) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
INCOME TAX REFERENCE No 125 of 1995
For Approval and Signature:
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE R.K.ABICHANDANI and
MR.JUSTICE KUNDAN SINGH
============================================================
1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed
to see the judgements?
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not?
3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy
of the judgement?
4. Whether this case involves a substantial question
of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution
of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder?
5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge?
-------------------------------------------------------------- COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXVersus MAYUR J JOSHI -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance:
MR MANISH R BHATT for Petitioner
MR MANISH J SHAH for the Respondent.
-------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE R.K.ABICHANDANI and
MR.JUSTICE KUNDAN SINGH
Date of decision: 06/05/98
ORAL JUDGEMENT
��(Per R.K.Abichandani,J)
��The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal has
referredthe following question for the opinion of this
Court under section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
"Whether the Appellate Tribunal is right in law
and on facts in directing the ITO to allow
deduction of 40% of incentive bonus towards
expenses for earning the same ?"
2.��Similar question had come up for consideration before this Court in ITR No.54 of 1993 with other cognate matters. For the reasons given in our judgment dated 27.4.1998,in the said group of matters, we hold that the Tribunal was right in directing the ITO to allow the deduction of incentive bonus towards expenses for earning the same, but only to the extent of reimbursement of expenses actually incurred upto the maximum limit of 30% of the incentive bonus earned by the assessee. The question is accordingly answered in the affirmative against the revenue and in favour of the assessee. The Reference stands disposed of accordingly with no order as to costs.
���****
***darji
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.