Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Arbuda Mills Ltd
High Court
13 Dec 2001 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Arbuda Mills Ltd
Date of order
13 Dec 2001
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Arbuda Mills Ltd, the High Court (2001) decided the matter.
Issue: The following question is referred to this Court at the instance of the Commissioner of Income-tax, for the opinion of this Court. "Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the assessee was entitled to the deduction in respect of the amount paid to M/s.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
INCOME TAX REFERENCE No 193 of 1988
For Approval and Signature:
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE B.C.PATEL
and
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA
============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
Versus
ARBUDA MILLS LTD
-------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR MIHIR JOSHI for MR MANISH R BHATT for Petitioner NOTICE SERVED for Respondent
--------------------------------------------------------------
CORAM : MR.JUSTICE B.C.PATEL
and
MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA
Date of decision: 13/12/2001
ORAL JUDGEMENT
(Per : MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA)
. The following question is referred to this Court at the instance of the Commissioner of Income-tax, for the opinion of this Court.
"Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the assessee was entitled to the deduction in respect of the amount paid to M/s. Mettur Neardhell Ltd. for the use of the Trade Mark "Tabilized" ?"
. We have heard Mr. Mihir Joshi, learned counsel for the applicant. Though served, none appears on behalf of the respondent. The assessment year is 1979-80. It was fairly pointed out by Mr. Joshi that the question referred by the Tribunal stands concluded in favour of the assessee by the decision of this Court in the case of Commissioner of Income-tax vs. Ashoka Mills Ltd., 218 ITR 526. For the reasons stated in the said decision, we answer the question referred to us in the affirmative i.e.. in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue. The Reference stands disposed off accordingly. There shall be no order as to costs.
�[B.C. PATEL, J.]�[D.A. MEHTA, J.]
*****
pirzada/-
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.