Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Ate Enterprises
High Court
20 Feb 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Ate Enterprises
Date of order
20 Feb 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Ate Enterprises, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: As the motion for condoning delay is dismissed, appeal also stands dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2037 OF 2007
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.789 OF 2007
Commissioner of Income-tax- ..Appellant
Versus
ATE Enterprises ..Respondent
----
Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the appellant.
----
Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ
Coram : F.I.Rebello &
R.S.Mohite,JJ
Date : 20.02.2008
PC
1. This is a motion for condoning 1344 days delay
in filing of the main appeal. A perusal of the
affidavit-in-support indicates that the approval for
filing appeal was granted by CCIT-2(1) on 28.7.2003
and thereafter the matter was sent for preparing the
appeal memo. The appeal ultimately came to be filed
on 18.4.2007. No dates have been given in respect
of the events which occurred between 28.7.2003 and
18.4.2007. In our view, cause shown does not amount
to sufficient cause. Hence motion dismissed.
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.789 OF 2007
. As the motion for condoning delay is dismissed,
appeal also stands dismissed.
(R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J)
(R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue