Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Atul Products Ltd
High Court
02 Apr 2003 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Atul Products Ltd
Date of order
02 Apr 2003
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Atul Products Ltd, the High Court (2003) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Issue: Whether it is to be circulated to the concerned : NO Magistrate/Magistrates,Judge/Judges,Tribunal/Tribunals? -------------------------------------------------------------- COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXVersus ATUL PRODUCTS LTD. -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: 1...
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
INCOME TAX APPLICATION No 404 of 1999
For Approval and Signature:
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE R.K.ABICHANDANI
and
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE K.M.MEHTA
============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the concerned : NO Magistrate/Magistrates,Judge/Judges,Tribunal/Tribunals? -------------------------------------------------------------- COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXVersus
ATUL PRODUCTS LTD.
--------------------------------------------------------------
Appearance:
1. INCOME TAX APPLICATION No. 404 of 1999
MR MANISH R BHATT for Petitioner No. 1 MR JP SHAH for Respondent No. 1
--------------------------------------------------------------
CORAM : MR.JUSTICE R.K.ABICHANDANI
and
MR.JUSTICE K.M.MEHTA
Date of decision: 02/04/2003
ORAL JUDGEMENT
(Per : MR.JUSTICE R.K.ABICHANDANI)
�The applicant seeks Reference on the following
question:
"Whether, the Appellate Tribunal is right in law
and on facts in confirming the order passed by the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) deleting the addition made on account of change in the
method of stock valuation?"
�This application was ordered to be heard with ITA
No. 351 of 1999 which was also preferred by the same assessee in respect of a different assessment year. A Division Bench of this court by order dated 2.2.2001 has rejected that application. In view of the same, the present application under Section 256(2) of the I.T. Act for calling for the Reference in respect of the aforesaid question cannot be accepted as it has been held that no question of law arises. Rule is, therefore, discharged
with no order as to costs.
���� (R.K. ABICHANDANI, J)
���� (K.M. MEHTA, J)
(pkn)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.