Case LawHigh Court › Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Bahujan Sa...

Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Bahujan Samaj Party

High Court 08 Aug 2017 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Bahujan Samaj Party
Date of order
08 Aug 2017
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Bahujan Samaj Party, the High Court (2017) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI R-31 + ITA 136/2005 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Zoheb Hossain, Senior standing counsel with Mr. Deepak Anand, Junior standing counsel. versus BAHUJAN SAMAJ PARTY .... Respondent R-32 + ITA 142/2005 & CM APPL 2924/2005 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Zoheb Hossain, Senior standing counsel with Mr. Deepak Anand, Junior standing counsel. versus BAHUJAN SAMAJ PARTY .... Respondent R-33 + ITA 189/2005 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Zoheb Hossain, Senior standing counsel with Mr. Deepak Anand, Junior standing counsel. versus BAHUJAN SAMAJ PARTY .... Respondent R-34 + ITA 191/2005 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Zoheb Hossain, Senior standing counsel with Mr. Deepak Anand, Junior standing counsel. versus BAHUJAN SAMAJ PARTY .... Respondent R-35 + ITA 192/2005 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Zoheb Hossain, Senior standing counsel with Mr. Deepak Anand, Junior standing counsel. versus BAHUJAN SAMAJ PARTY .... Respondent R-36 + ITA 193/2005 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Zoheb Hossain, Senior standing counsel with Mr. Deepak Anand, Junior standing counsel. versus BAHUJAN SAMAJ PARTY .... Respondent R-37 + ITA 197/2005 & CM APPL 3762/2005 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Petitioner versus BAHUJAN SAMAJ PARTY .... Respondent CORAM:JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH % O R D E R04.07.2017 1. These appeals were admitted way back on 21[st] July 2006, and have been listed thereafter for the first time today. None appears for the Respondent. 2. Counsel for the Revenue states that the question framed in these appeals stands answered against the Assessee and in favour of the Revenue by the decision dated 23rd May 2016 of this Court in ITA 145 of 2001 (Commissioner of Income Tax v. Indian National Congress (I). 3. Issue notice without process fee to the Respondent through counsel appearing for it, returnable on 8[th] August 2017 in the category of ‘After ’Notice Miscellaneous Matters. S.MURALIDHAR, J JULY 04, 2017 Rm PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan