Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Bhagwati Shipbreaking Indus
High Court
17 Mar 2004 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Bhagwati Shipbreaking Indus
Date of order
17 Mar 2004
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Bhagwati Shipbreaking Indus, the High Court (2004) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Issue: Whether it is to be circulated to the concerned : NO Magistrate/Magistrates,Judge/Judges,Tribunal/Tribunals? -------------------------------------------------------------- COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX Versus BHAGWATI SHIPBREAKING INDUS. -------------------------------------------------------------- Ap...
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
INCOME TAX REFERENCE No 382 of 1992
For Approval and Signature:
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.S.SHAH
and
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.KAPADIA
============================================================
1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO
to see the judgements?
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO
3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO
of the judgement?
4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO
of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution
of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder?
5. Whether it is to be circulated to the concerned : NO Magistrate/Magistrates,Judge/Judges,Tribunal/Tribunals?
-------------------------------------------------------------- COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
Versus
BHAGWATI SHIPBREAKING INDUS.
-------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance:
1. INCOME TAX REFERENCE No. 382 of 1992 MR MANISH R BHATT for Petitioner No. 1 NOTICE SERVED for Respondent No. 1
--------------------------------------------------------------
CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.S.SHAH
and
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.KAPADIA
Date of decision: 17/03/2004
ORAL JUDGEMENT
(Per : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.S.SHAH)
�In this reference at the instance of the revenue,
the following question has been referred for our opinion
"Whether, the Appellate Tribunal is right in law
and on facts in directing the assessing officer to allow deduction u/s.80HHA and 80-I when the assessee was carrying on ship breaking activity?"
2.�We have heard Mr MR Bhatt, learned Standing Counsel for the revenue. Though served, none appears for the respondent-assessee.
3.�Our attention is invited to the decision of this Court in CIT vs. Vijay Ship Breaking Corporation, 261 ITR 113 wherein this Court has taken the view, in the context of the provisions of Section 80HH and 80I of the Income-tax Act, 1961, that ship breaking is not a manufacturing activity. Since the provisions of Section 80HHA are also similar to the provisions of Section 80HH and 80I in so far as the question of eligibility for getting deduction under the said provision is concerned, we follow the aforesaid decision of this Court and answer the question referred to us in the negative i.e. in favour of the revenue and against the assessee.
4.�The reference accordingly stands disposed of.
�����(M.S. SHAH, J.)
�����(A.M.KAPADIA, J.)
zgs/-
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.