Case LawHigh Court › Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Camco Colo...

Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Camco Colour Co

High Court 14 Jun 2005 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Camco Colour Co
Date of order
14 Jun 2005
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Camco Colour Co, the High Court (2005) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION Income Tax Application No. 453 of 1999 The Commissioner of Income Tax, Mumbai .. Applicant V/s. British Bank of Middle East, Mumbai .. Respondent Mr. Prem Vyas for the Applicant None present for the Respondent CORAM : S. RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM : S. RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM : S. RADHAKRISHNAN & A.S. AGUIAR, JJ. DATED : 14.06.2005. A.S. AGUIAR, JJ. DATED : 14.06.2005. P.C.:- P.C.:- 1. Heard the learned counsel for the Applicant. Perused the assessment order. 2. The claim involved in the above Application is less than Rs. 2 Lakhs. We have also perused the judgment of the Division Bench of this Court in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax v. Camco Colour Co., Commissioner of Income Tax v. Camco Colour Co.,reported in (2002) 254 ITR 565 (Bom.). In view of the reported in (2002) 254 ITR 565 (Bom.) policy decision taken by Central Board of Direct Taxes ("CBDT" for short) vide Circular F. No. 279/126/98-ITJ dated 27/3/2000 wherein the Revenue has decided not to file any Appeal or Reference, if the tax liability is less than Rs. 2 Lakhs. 3. As in the present case, the tax liability is less than Rs. 2 Lakhs, we dissmiss the above Application. (S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (A.S. AGUIAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan