Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Camco Colour Co
High Court
08 Aug 2005 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Camco Colour Co
Date of order
08 Aug 2005
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Camco Colour Co, the High Court (2005) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
: 1 :
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPLICATION NO.6 OF 1999
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
The Commissioner of Income Tax
Bombay City-XI, Bombay ...Applicants.
V/s.
Mr.G.Hutzfeld ...Respondents.
Dr.P.Daniel with G.Hariharan for the Applicants.
None for the Respondent.
CORAM: S.RADHAKRISHNAN &
CORAM: S.RADHAKRISHNAN &
CORAM: S.RADHAKRISHNAN &
J.H.BHATIA, JJ. DATE : 8th August, 2005.
J.H.BHATIA, JJ.
DATE : 8th August, 2005.
P.C.:
P.C.:
1. Heard the learned counsel for the Applicants.
2. The learned counsel for the Applicants states
that the tax claim involved in the above is less than
Rs.2 lakhs. We have also perused the judgment of the
Division Bench of this Court in the case of
Commissioner of Income Tax v. Camco Colour Co.,
Commissioner of Income Tax v. Camco Colour Co.,reported in (2002) 254 ITR 565 (Bom.). In view of the
reported in (2002) 254 ITR 565 (Bom.)
policy decision taken by Central Board of Direct Taxes
("CBDT" for short) vide Circular F.No.279/126/98-ITJ
dated 27/3/2000 wherein the Revenue has decided not to
file any Appeal or Reference, if the tax liability is
less than Rs.2 Lakhs.
: 2 :
3. Hence, the above Application stands
dismissed.
(S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
(S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
(S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
(J.H.BHATIA, J.)
(J.H.BHATIA, J.)
(J.H.BHATIA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.