Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Deepak J Panchal Heir Of J S Panchal
High Court
03 Jul 2001 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Deepak J Panchal Heir Of J S Panchal
Date of order
03 Jul 2001
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Deepak J Panchal Heir Of J S Panchal, the High Court (2001) decided the matter.
Issue: Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO @ COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX Versus DEEPAK J PANCHAL HEIR OF J S PANCHAL -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR BB NAIK for MR MANISH R BHATT for Petitioner No.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
INCOME TAX REFERENCE No 176 of 1986
For Approval and Signature:
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE A.R.DAVE
and
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA
============================================================
1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements?
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO
3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO
of the judgement?
4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO
of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder?
5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO
@
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
Versus
DEEPAK J PANCHAL HEIR OF J S PANCHAL
--------------------------------------------------------------
Appearance:
MR BB NAIK for MR MANISH R BHATT for Petitioner No. 1 MR NR DIVETIA for Respondent No. 1
CORAM : MR.JUSTICE A.R.DAVE
and
MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA
Date of decision: 03/07/2001
ORAL JUDGEMENT
(Per : MR.JUSTICE A.R.DAVE)
�At the instance of the revenue, the following
question has been referred to this Court for its opinion by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Ahmedabad Bench 'A' under the provisions of sec. 256(1) of the Income-tax
Act, 1961 :
"Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the assessee is entitled in law to the deduction u/s 80U of the Income-tax Act, 1961
as claimed?"
2.�Learned advocate Shri B.B. Naik has appeared for the applicant-revenue and learned advocate Shri N.R. Divetia has appeared for the respondent-assessee.
3.�It has been submitted by the learned advocates that the issue involved in the present reference has already been decided in the case of CIT v. Bhagwat Prasad P. Parikh, 239 ITR 645. In view of the law laid down by this court in Bhagwat Prasad P. Parikh (supra), we answer the question in the affirmative i.e. in favour
of the assessee and against the revenue.
�The reference stands disposed of accordingly with no order as to costs.
�����(A.R. Dave, J.)
�����(D.A. Mehta, J.)
(hn)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.