Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Dhijen Darshi Family Trust
High Court
31 Aug 2000 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Dhijen Darshi Family Trust
Date of order
31 Aug 2000
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Dhijen Darshi Family Trust, the High Court (2000) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Issue: 379 of 1983 dated 2-5-1998, the questions quoted below referred to this Court in assessee's own case for earlier assessment years are answered in favour of the assessee and against the revenue: "1.Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and on a true interpretation of the trust de...
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
INCOME TAX REFERENCE No 60 of 1985
For Approval and Signature:
Hon'ble CHIEF JUSTICE MR DM DHARMADHIKARI
and
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE A.R.DAVE
============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAXVersus DHIJEN DARSHI FAMILY TRUST -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR MANISH R BHATT for Petitioner NOTICE SERVED for Respondent No. 1
--------------------------------------------------------------
CORAM : CHIEF JUSTICE MR DM DHARMADHIKARI
and
MR.JUSTICE A.R.DAVE
Date of decision: 31/08/2000
ORAL JUDGEMENT (Per D.M. DHARMADHIKARI, C.J.)
1.�As pointed out by the learned counsel appearing
for the Department, by the decision in Income Tax
Reference No. 379 of 1983 dated 2-5-1998, the questions
quoted below referred to this Court in assessee's own case for earlier assessment years are answered in favour of the assessee and against the revenue:
"1.Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances
of the case and on a true interpretation of the
trust deed, the conclusion of the Appellate
Tribunal that the assessee trust was a specific
trust and not a discretionary trust as held by
the Income-tax Officer is sustainable in law?"
2. Whether, on the facts and in the
circumstances of the case, the assessment in the
case of the assessee is not required to be made
under the provisions of sec. 164 of the I.T. Act,
1961?"
3. Whether the finding of the Appellate Tribunal
that the assessee trust is a specific trust and
not a discretionary one is correct in law in view
of clause 8(a) and 8(b) of the trust deed which
gave discretionary power to the trust to
distribute the income?"
3.�The questions referred to us are, therefore,
answered in favour of the assessee and aginst the revenue. A copy of the order dated 2-5-98 in Income Tax Refernece No. 379 of 1983 in the case of assessee's own
case produced before us, is taken on record.
�There shall be no order as to costs.
���(D.M. DHARMADHIKARI, C.J.)
����(A.R. DAVE, J)
[sndevu]
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.