Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Dlf Ltd
High Court
05 Sep 2017 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Dlf Ltd
Date of order
05 Sep 2017
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Dlf Ltd, the High Court (2017) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeal is accordingly dismissed but, in the circumstances, with no orders as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
$~
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
22
+
ITA No. 815/2009
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
..... Appellant
Through:Mr. Sanjay Kumar & Mr. Rahul Chaudhary, Standing Counsel for the Revenue
versus
DLF LTD.
..... Respondent
Through:Mr. Ajay Vohra, Senior Advocate with Ms. Kavita Jha &, Ms. Roopali Gupta, Advocates
CORAM:
JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH
%
O R D E R05.09.2017
1. This is an appeal by the Revenue against the order dated 15[th] December 2008 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (‘ITAT’) passed in ITA No.1468/Del/2008 for the Assessment Year (‘AY’) 1999-00.
2. While admitting this appeal on 30[th] November 2011, this Court framed the following question of law for consideration:
“Whether the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) erred in law in
allowing the depreciation on DLF Centre amounting to Rs.31,00,307/- in respect of its self-occupied portion?”
3. In view of the order passed today in ITA No. 407/2009, the aforesaid question is answered in the negative, i.e. in favour of the Assessee and
against the Revenue.
4. The appeal is accordingly dismissed but, in the circumstances, with no orders as to costs.
S. MURALIDHAR, J.
SEPTEMBER 05, 2017 rd
PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.