Case LawHigh Court › Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Dlf Univer...

Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Dlf Universal Ltd

High Court 18 May 2017 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Dlf Universal Ltd
Date of order
18 May 2017
Assessment year(s)
1994-95, 1997-98
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Dlf Universal Ltd, the High Court (2017) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Issue: While admitting this appeal on 30th November 2011, this Court framed for consideration the following questions of law: (i)Whether the ITAT was correct in law in upholding the order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and giving ITA 176/2010 Page 1 of 2 the relief of Rs.4,85,240/- regarding valua...

Decision: The appeal is accordingly dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI25 + ITA 176/2010 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Dileep Shivpuri, Sr. Standing Counsel with Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Jr. Standing Counsel versus DLF UNIVERSAL LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Ajay Vohra, Senior Advocate with Ms. Kavita Jha and Mr. Vaibhav Kulkarni, Advocates CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR O R D E R% 18.05.2017 1. This appeal by the Revenue under Section 260 A of the Income Tax Act 1961 ('Act') is directed against the order dated 6th June 2008 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) in ITA No.695/Del/2003 for Assessment Year (AY) 1999-2000. 2. While admitting this appeal on 30th November 2011, this Court framed for consideration the following questions of law: (i)Whether the ITAT was correct in law in upholding the order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and giving ITA 176/2010 Page 1 of 2 the relief of Rs.4,85,240/- regarding valuation of closing stock by reducing valuation of closing stock by the sellable area at 60.77%? (ii) Whether the CIT (A) erred in law in directing the AO to assess the rent receipts form DLF Centre which also includes air conditioning charges as ‘Income from House Property’? 3. Question (i) stands answered in favour of the Assessee by the judgment dated 21[st] December, 2016 passed by this court in ITA Nos. 159 and 326 of 2010 for AY 1994-95. 4. As far as question (ii) is concerned, by separate order passed by this court in today in ITA 407 of 2009 for AY 1997-98 filed by the Revenue against the same Assessee, the question stands answered in favour of the Assessee and against the Revenue. 5. The appeal is accordingly dismissed. S. MURALIDHAR, J MAY 18, 2017 B CHANDER SHEKHAR, J ITA 176/2010
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan