Case LawHigh Court › Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Dwarika Na...

Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Dwarika Nath Jha

High Court 31 Jan 2013 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · patnahcucisdb94
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Dwarika Nath Jha
Date of order
31 Jan 2013
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Dwarika Nath Jha, the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: The present appeal is also therefore dismissed on the same ground.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNAMiscellaneous Appeal No.470 of 2006 ====================================================== Commissioner Of Income Tax Versus Dwarika Nath Jha .... .... Appellant/s .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :For the Appellant/s : Mr. Prakash Sahay For the Respondent/s : Mr. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHAand HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEYORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA) Counsel for the appellant very fairly acknowledges that the 7 31-01-2013 present appeal is covered by the two orders of the Court in M.A. No. 471 of 2006 and M.A. No. 474 of 2006 holding in similar circumstances that the appeal involved no substantial question of law. The present appeal is also therefore dismissed on the same ground. (Navin Sinha, J) Snkumar/- (Shivaji Pandey,J)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan