Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Gujarat Carbon Limited

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD INCOME TAX REFERENCE No 206, 206A & 206B of 1992 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE M.S.SHAH and Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE K.A.PUJ ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the concerned : NO Magistrate/Magistrates,Judge/Judges,Tribunal/Tribunals? @ COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAXVersus GUJARAT CARBON LIMITED -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: 1. INCOME TAX REFERENCE No. 206 of 1992 MR MANISH R BHATT for Petitioner No. 1 MR JP SHAH for Respondent No. 1 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE M.S.SHAH and MR.JUSTICE K.A.PUJ Date of decision: 17/07/2002 (Per : MR.JUSTICE M.S.SHAH) �In these references at the instance of the revenue, the following common questions are referred for our opinion in respect of assessment years 1981-82 to 1983-84:- "Whether, the Appellate Tribunal is right in law and on facts in treating the amounts paid for royalty to collaborators as revenue expenditure?" 2.�We have heard Mr Manish R Bhatt, learned Sr. Standing Counsel for the revenue and Mr Manish J Shah, learned counsel for the respondent - assessee. 3.�At the hearing of this reference, our attention is invited to the decision dated 5-12-2001 of this Court in the case of this very assessee reported in (2002) 254 ITR 294 wherein this Court had an opportunity to consider the same question for the assessment year 1980-81. After considering all the relevant material and the decisions of the Apex Court, this Court answered the question in favour of the assessee and held that amount paid for royalties to collaborators is revenue expenditure and accordingly answered the question in favour of the assessee. �Following the said decision, our answer to the question referred is in the affirmative i.e. in favour of the assessee and against the revenue. 4.�The References accordingly stand disposed of with no order as to costs. ���(M.S. Shah,J)�(K.A. Puj,J) zgs/-