Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Gujarat Carbon Ltd
High Court
23 Apr 1999 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Gujarat Carbon Ltd
Date of order
23 Apr 1999
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Gujarat Carbon Ltd, the High Court (1999) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Issue: Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? -------------------------------------------------------------- COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Versus GUJARAT CARBON LTD -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR MANISH R BHATT for Petitioner NOTICE SERVED for Respond...
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
INCOME TAX REFERENCE No 289 of 1984
For Approval and Signature:
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE R.BALIA. and
MR.JUSTICE A.R.DAVE
============================================================
1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed
to see the judgements?
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not?
3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy
of the judgement?
4. Whether this case involves a substantial question
of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution
of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder?
5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge?
-------------------------------------------------------------- COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
Versus
GUJARAT CARBON LTD
--------------------------------------------------------------
Appearance:
MR MANISH R BHATT for Petitioner
NOTICE SERVED for Respondent No. 1
--------------------------------------------------------------
CORAM : MR.JUSTICE R.BALIA. and
MR.JUSTICE A.R.DAVE
Date of decision: 23/04/99
ORAL JUDGEMENT (Per R.Balia, J) �At the instance of Commissioner of Income tax. Baroda, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Ahmedabad Bench 'A' has referred the following question of law arising out of its order dated December 1983 in ITA No. 419/Ahd/83 relating to assessment years 1979-80.
"Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in law in
coming to the conclusion that the interest of
Rs.19,791/- received by the assessee on the deposit which was out of share application money was not liable to be taxed in the hands of the
assessee?".
2.�The questions require consideration whether the
interest received on deposits made out of share application money by the assessee is not taxable as a capital receipt or is a revenue receipt liable to be taxed. The assessee's contention is that all the expenses incurred for raising capital are capital expenditure. Necessarily any amount which incidently comes on deposit of share application which remain with the company until applications are dealt with and shares
are allotted is capital receipt as part of share
application receipts. The answer to the question referred to us has been answered in the case of Tuticorin Alkali Chemicals & Fertilizers Ltd. Vs. C.I.T.,
referred to us has been answered in the case of Tuticorin Alkali Chemicals & Fertilizers Ltd. Vs. C.I.T., reported in 227 ITR 1997 by the Supreme Court. The Court
held as under:-
"Interest income is always of a revenue nature,
unless it is received as damages or compensation.
It cannot be said that amount accrued or received
as interest on share application money is an
amount received by the assessee by way of damages
or compensation."
�Therefore the exigibility of interest to tax must
be answered in the affirmative that is to say in favour
of revenue and against the assessee.
�Accordingly, we answer the question referred to
us in the negative i.e. in favour of the revenue and
against the assessee. There shall be no orders as to
costs.
���*******
jitu
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.