Case LawHigh Court › Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Gujarat In...

Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Gujarat Industrial Developmentcorporation Ltd

High Court 28 Apr 1999 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Gujarat Industrial Developmentcorporation Ltd
Date of order
28 Apr 1999
Assessment year(s)
1976-77
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Gujarat Industrial Developmentcorporation Ltd, the High Court (1999) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD INCOME TAX REFERENCE No 316 of 1984 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE R.BALIA. and MR.JUSTICE A.R.DAVE ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? -------------------------------------------------------------- COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX Versus GUJARAT INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENTCORPORATION LTD -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR MANISH R BHATT for Petitioner MR RK PATEL for Respondent No. 1 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE R.BALIA. and MR.JUSTICE A.R.DAVE Date of decision: 28/04/99 ORAL JUDGEMENT 1.�When the matter came up for hearing both the counsel for the parties state that the question refered to us was substantially also the subject matter of Income Tax Reference No. 70 of 1983 in respect of the very same assessee for the assessment year 1976-77 which has been decided by this Court on 27.9.1995. This court referring to decision of Madras High Court in CIT Tamil Nadu III v. Aruna Sugars Limited 123 ITR 619 answered the Question No.1 responding to the question referred to above in favour of assessee and against the revenue. 2.�Following the aforesaid decision in assessee's own case, we answer the question in favour of assessee and against the revenue, that is to say, in affirmative. �There shall be no order as to costs. ��(Rajesh Balia, J) (A.R. Dave, J)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan