Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Gujarat Metal Cast P Ltd
High Court
19 Jul 2001 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Gujarat Metal Cast P Ltd
Date of order
19 Jul 2001
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Gujarat Metal Cast P Ltd, the High Court (2001) decided the matter.
Issue: Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO @ COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXVersus GUJARAT METAL CAST P LTD -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: 1.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
INCOME TAX REFERENCE No 303 of 1987
For Approval and Signature:
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE A.R.DAVE
and
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA
============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO @ COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXVersus GUJARAT METAL CAST P LTD -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance:
1. INCOME TAX REFERENCE No. 303 of 1987 MR BB NAIK for MR RP BHATT for Petitioner No. 1 SHRI RK PATEL for the Respondent 1
--------------------------------------------------------------
CORAM : MR.JUSTICE A.R.DAVE
and
MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA
Date of decision: 27/07/2001
ORAL JUDGEMENT
(Per : MR.JUSTICE A.R.DAVE)
�At the instance of the revenue, the following
question of law has been referred to this court for its
opinion by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Ahmedabad Bench 'A' under the provisions of sec. 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'the
Act').
"Whether the assessee was entitled to
depreciation, investment allowance and relief u/s
80J on the cost of the assets without reducing
therefrom the subsidy received from the
Government?"
2.�Learned advocate B.B. Naik has appeared for the
revenue whereas learned advocate Shri R.K. Patel has
appeared for the respondent-assessee.
3.�It has been very fairly submitted by the learned advocates that the question, which has been referred to this court, has already been answered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of CIT v. P.J. Chemicals Ltd., 210 ITR 830.
4.�Looking to the law laid down by the Supreme Court in the case of P.J. Chemicals (supra), we answer the question in the affirmative i.e. in favour of the assessee and against the revenue.
�The reference stands disposed of accordingly with no order as to costs.��
�����(A.R. Dave, J.)
�����(D.A. Mehta, J.)
(hn)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.