Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Harsh Family Trust
High Court
31 Aug 2000 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Harsh Family Trust
Date of order
31 Aug 2000
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Harsh Family Trust, the High Court (2000) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The reference shall accordingly stand disposed of.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
INCOME TAX REFERENCE No 43 of 1985
For Approval and Signature:
Hon'ble CHIEF JUSTICE MR DM DHARMADHIKARI
and
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE A.R.DAVE
============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO
-------------------------------------------------------------- COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
Versus
HARSH FAMILY TRUST
-------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance:
MR MIHIR JOSHI FOR MR MANISH R BHATT for Petitioner
MR HM TALATI for Respondent No. 1
--------------------------------------------------------------
CORAM : CHIEF JUSTICE MR DM DHARMADHIKARI
and
MR.JUSTICE A.R.DAVE
Date of decision: 31/08/2000
ORAL JUDGEMENT (Per D.M. DHARMADHIKARI, C.J.)
1.�Learned counsel appearing for the Department
points out that by order dated 9-2-1999 in Income-Tax
Refernece No. 212 of 1984 concerning the same assessee for earlier assessment year, the following two questions were answered against the revenue and in favour of the
assessee:-
"1. Whether, the Tribunal has not erred in law
and on facts in holding that the assessee is a
specific trust and that its income is exempt?
2. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances
of the case, the finding of the Tribunal, that
the assessee trust is a specific trust and not
discretionary one liable to pay tax at the rate of 65% as held by the ITO is correct in law and sustainable from the material on record?"
2.�We, therefore, answer the two questions in favour
of the assessee and against the revenue. The reference shall accordingly stand disposed of. A copy of the order passed in Income Tax Reference No. 212 of 1984 decided on 9-2-1999 is taken on record.
�There shall be no order as to costs.
���(D.M. DHARMADHIKARI, C.J.)
����(A.R. DAVE, J)
[sndevu]
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.