Case LawHigh Court › Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Harsh Fami...

Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Harsh Family Trust

High Court 31 Aug 2000 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Harsh Family Trust
Date of order
31 Aug 2000
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Harsh Family Trust, the High Court (2000) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: The reference shall accordingly stand disposed of.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD INCOME TAX REFERENCE No 43 of 1985 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble CHIEF JUSTICE MR DM DHARMADHIKARI and Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE A.R.DAVE ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX Versus HARSH FAMILY TRUST -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR MIHIR JOSHI FOR MR MANISH R BHATT for Petitioner MR HM TALATI for Respondent No. 1 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : CHIEF JUSTICE MR DM DHARMADHIKARI and MR.JUSTICE A.R.DAVE Date of decision: 31/08/2000 ORAL JUDGEMENT (Per D.M. DHARMADHIKARI, C.J.) 1.�Learned counsel appearing for the Department points out that by order dated 9-2-1999 in Income-Tax Refernece No. 212 of 1984 concerning the same assessee for earlier assessment year, the following two questions were answered against the revenue and in favour of the assessee:- "1. Whether, the Tribunal has not erred in law and on facts in holding that the assessee is a specific trust and that its income is exempt? 2. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the finding of the Tribunal, that the assessee trust is a specific trust and not discretionary one liable to pay tax at the rate of 65% as held by the ITO is correct in law and sustainable from the material on record?" 2.�We, therefore, answer the two questions in favour of the assessee and against the revenue. The reference shall accordingly stand disposed of. A copy of the order passed in Income Tax Reference No. 212 of 1984 decided on 9-2-1999 is taken on record. �There shall be no order as to costs. ���(D.M. DHARMADHIKARI, C.J.) ����(A.R. DAVE, J) [sndevu]
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan