Case LawHigh Court › Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Hazarat Pi...

Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Hazarat Pir Shah-E-Alam Roza Estate Trust

High Court 20 Jul 1998 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Hazarat Pir Shah-E-Alam Roza Estate Trust
Date of order
20 Jul 1998
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Hazarat Pir Shah-E-Alam Roza Estate Trust, the High Court (1998) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Issue: Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? -------------------------------------------------------------- COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Versus HAZARAT PIR SHAH-E-ALAM ROZA ESTATE TRUST -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR MANISH R BHATT for Petitioner Mr...

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD INCOME TAX APPLICATION No 157 of 1998 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE C.K.THAKKER and MR.JUSTICE M.C.PATEL ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? -------------------------------------------------------------- COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Versus HAZARAT PIR SHAH-E-ALAM ROZA ESTATE TRUST -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR MANISH R BHATT for Petitioner Mr.R.K.Patel with Mr.B.D.Karia, for Respondent Assessee. -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE C.K.THAKKER and MR.JUSTICE M.C.PATEL Date of decision: 20/07/98 ORAL JUDGEMENT (per C.K.THAKKER J.) Heard both the parties. We are told that an application made by the revenue proposing identical questions has been allowed by this court. �In the present application, the following "(1) Whether, the Appellate Tribunal is right in law and on facts in holding that the assessee Roza was a Wakf and thecomplex of buildings and lands at Rasulabaug and lands at Vasna, Isanpur and Sarsa were Wakf properties belonging to Roza ? (2) Whether, the Appellate Tribunal is right in law and on facts in holding that the income of the assessee Roza was exigible to exemption under Section 11 of the Act subject to the conditions in the said Section ? (3) Whether the Appellate Tribunal is right in law and on facts in holding that actual expenditure on themaintenance of the Sajjahanarin and his family members exceeding Rs.30,000/- was notto be included in the income of the Roza ?" �In view of the fact that an application raising similar questions has been allowed by this court, we allow this application also. �The Tribunal is directed to furnish statement of case in respect of the aforesaid questions under Section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, expeditiously. Rule is made absolute accordingly with no order as to costs. Dt. 20.7.1998.����(C.K.THAKKER J.) �����(M.C.PATEL J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan