Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Hazarat Pir Shah-E-Alam Roza Estate Trust
High Court
20 Jul 1998 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Hazarat Pir Shah-E-Alam Roza Estate Trust
Date of order
20 Jul 1998
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Hazarat Pir Shah-E-Alam Roza Estate Trust, the High Court (1998) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Issue: Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? -------------------------------------------------------------- COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Versus HAZARAT PIR SHAH-E-ALAM ROZA ESTATE TRUST -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR MANISH R BHATT for Petitioner Mr...
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
INCOME TAX APPLICATION No 155 of 1998
For Approval and Signature:
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE C.K.THAKKER and
MR.JUSTICE M.C.PATEL
============================================================
1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed
to see the judgements?
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not?
3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy
of the judgement?
4. Whether this case involves a substantial question
of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution
of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder?
5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge?
--------------------------------------------------------------
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
Versus
HAZARAT PIR SHAH-E-ALAM ROZA ESTATE TRUST
--------------------------------------------------------------
Appearance:
MR MANISH R BHATT for Petitioner
Mr.R.K.Patel with Mr.B.D.Karia, for Respondent
Assessee.
--------------------------------------------------------------
CORAM : MR.JUSTICE C.K.THAKKER and
MR.JUSTICE M.C.PATEL
Date of decision: 20/07/98
ORAL JUDGEMENT (per C.K.THAKKER J.)
Heard both the parties. We are told that an application
made by the revenue proposing identical questions has
been allowed by this court.
�In the present application, the following
"(1) Whether, the Appellate Tribunal is right in law
and on facts in holding that the assessee Roza
was a Wakf and thecomplex of buildings and lands
at Rasulabaug and lands at Vasna, Isanpur and
Sarsa were Wakf properties belonging to Roza ?
(2) Whether, the Appellate Tribunal is right in law
and on facts in holding that the income of the
assessee Roza was exigible to exemption under
Section 11 of the Act subject to the conditions
in the said Section ?
(3) Whether the Appellate Tribunal is right in law
and on facts in holding that actual expenditure
on themaintenance of the Sajjahanarin and his
family members exceeding Rs.30,000/- was notto be
included in the income of the Roza ?"
�In view of the fact that an application raising
similar questions has been allowed by this court, we
allow this application also.
�The Tribunal is directed to furnish statement of
case in respect of the aforesaid questions under Section
256(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, expeditiously. Rule
is made absolute accordingly with no order as to costs.
Dt. 20.7.1998.����(C.K.THAKKER J.)
�����(M.C.PATEL J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.