In Commissioner Of Income Tax v. H.h. Maharaja Fatesingh Familytrust, the High Court (1997) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Issue: Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? -------------------------------------------------------------- COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Versus H.H.
Decision: Reference stands disposed of accordingly. *****
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
INCOME TAX REFERENCE No 253 of 1983
For Approval and Signature:
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE R.K.ABICHANDANI and
MR.JUSTICE R.BALIA.
============================================================
1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed
to see the judgements?
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not?
3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy
of the judgement?
4. Whether this case involves a substantial question
of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution
of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder?
5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge?
--------------------------------------------------------------
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
Versus
H.H. MAHARAJA FATESINGH FAMILYTRUST NO.2 -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR MANISH R BHATT for Petitioner
MR KC PATEL for Respondent No. 1
--------------------------------------------------------------
CORAM : MR.JUSTICE R.K.ABICHANDANI and
MR.JUSTICE R.BALIA.
Date of decision: 07/01/97
ORAL JUDGEMENT
1.�The following two questions have been referred
to this Court by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal,
Ahmedabad Bench `C' for its opinion:
1. "Whether on the facts and in the
circumstances of the case, the Tribunal
was right in law in coming to the
conclusion that the provision of Section
60 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 were not
applicable to the facts of the case?"
2. "Whether on the facts and in the
circumstances of the case the Tribunal
was right in law in coming to the
conclusion that the interest income
earned by the beneficiaries of the
assessee Trust were not liable to be
included in the income of the assessee on
the principle of constructive receipt?"
2.�For the reasons stated by us in our judgement in
Income Tax Reference No. 252 of 1983 today, both the
questions referred to this court are answered in the
affirmative in favour of the assessee and against the
revenue. Reference stands disposed of accordingly.
*****
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.