Case LawHigh Court › Commissioner Of Income Tax v. H.h. Mahar...

Commissioner Of Income Tax v. H.h. Maharaja Fatesingh Familytrust

High Court 07 Jan 1997 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax v. H.h. Maharaja Fatesingh Familytrust
Date of order
07 Jan 1997
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income Tax v. H.h. Maharaja Fatesingh Familytrust, the High Court (1997) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Issue: Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? -------------------------------------------------------------- COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Versus H.H.

Decision: Reference stands disposed of accordingly. *****

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD INCOME TAX REFERENCE No 253 of 1983 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE R.K.ABICHANDANI and MR.JUSTICE R.BALIA. ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? -------------------------------------------------------------- COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Versus H.H. MAHARAJA FATESINGH FAMILYTRUST NO.2 -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR MANISH R BHATT for Petitioner MR KC PATEL for Respondent No. 1 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE R.K.ABICHANDANI and MR.JUSTICE R.BALIA. Date of decision: 07/01/97 ORAL JUDGEMENT 1.�The following two questions have been referred to this Court by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Ahmedabad Bench `C' for its opinion: 1. "Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in law in coming to the conclusion that the provision of Section 60 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 were not applicable to the facts of the case?" 2. "Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case the Tribunal was right in law in coming to the conclusion that the interest income earned by the beneficiaries of the assessee Trust were not liable to be included in the income of the assessee on the principle of constructive receipt?" 2.�For the reasons stated by us in our judgement in Income Tax Reference No. 252 of 1983 today, both the questions referred to this court are answered in the affirmative in favour of the assessee and against the revenue. Reference stands disposed of accordingly. *****
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan