Commissioner Of Income Tax v. H.p. Bus Stand Management & Development Authority
High Court
21 Sep 2016 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · cmis
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax v. H.p. Bus Stand Management & Development Authority
Date of order
21 Sep 2016
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax v. H.p. Bus Stand Management & Development Authority, the High Court (2016) decided the matter.
Decision: As such, present appeals stand disposed of.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
ITA No.25 of 2014 a/w ITAs No.26 & 27 of 2014 Date of decision: 21.09.2016
Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant
Versus
H.P. Bus Stand Management & Development Authority . Respondent
Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Mansoor Ahmad Mir, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge
Whether approved for reporting?
For the Appellant(s): Mr.Vinay Kuthiala, Senior Advocate, with Ms.Vandana Kuthiala, Advocate. For the respondent(s): M/s Vishal Mohan, Sushant Keprate and Aditya Sood, Advocates.
________________________________________________________________________________
Mansoor Ahmad Mir, Chief Justice (oral)
Pursuant to circular No. 21/2015 issued vide F.No. 279/Misc.142/2007-ITJ(Pt) by Government of India, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, Central Board Direct Taxes dated 10.12.2015, an office order dated 4[th] January, 2016 stands issued by the Registrar (Judicial & JB) of this Court to the following effect:
“Hon’ble the Chief Justice has been pleased to order in pursuance of circular No. 21/2015 issued vide F.No. 279/Misc.142/2007-ITJ(Pt) by Government of India, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, Central Board Direct Taxes dated 10.12.2015 as under:
“(1) It is to be specifically mentioned by the Income Tax Department while filing the appeal in the High Court that the tax effect exceeds Rs.20,00,000/- except in the following matters:
(a) Where the Constitutional validity of the provisions of an Act or Rule are under challenge,
or
(b) Where Board’s order, Notification, Instruction or Circular has been held to be illegal or ultra vires, or
(c) Where Revenue Audit objection in the case has been accepted by the Department, or been accepted by the Department, or
(d) Where the additional relates to undisclosed foreign assets/bank accounts.
2. The pending appeals where the tax effect does not exceed Rs.20,00,000/- are directed to be withdrawn/not pressed.”
2. It is not in dispute that the total tax factor is less than Rs.20,00,000/- in each of these appeals and that they do not fall within anyone of the exceptions. As such, present appeals stand disposed of. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.
( Mansoor Ahmad Mir ) Chief Justice
September 21, 2016 ( Sandeep Sharma )
(rajni/vt)
Judge
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.