Case LawHigh Court › Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Hsbc Secur...

Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Hsbc Securities & Capital Markets (I) Pvt.ltd

High Court 10 Nov 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Hsbc Securities & Capital Markets (I) Pvt.ltd
Date of order
10 Nov 2009
Assessment year(s)
1997-98
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Hsbc Securities & Capital Markets (I) Pvt.ltd, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Under these circumstances, the appeal stands dismissed in limine with no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
bgp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1442 OF 2009 Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. HSBC Securities & Capital Markets (I) Pvt.Ltd. ..Appellant ..Respondent Mr.Vimal Gupta for appellant. Mr.J.D.Mistry a/w.Rajesh Shah i/b. Rajesh Shah & Co. for respondent. P.C. 1.Heard. Perused appeal. CORAM :- V.C.DAGA &J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ. 10[th] NOVEMBER,2009 DATE : 2.The Tribunal has relied on the order passed in the case of the assessee itself for the A.Y.1997-98, wherein the same issue was involved. The said order has been accepted by the Revenue. No case is made out to take contrary view. Apart from this, no factual aspect is brought on record as to why the appeal has not been preferred against the order passed for the A.Y.1997-98. Photocopy of the earlier order pertaining to A.Y.1997-98 passed by the Tribunal is tendered on record. Under these circumstances, the appeal stands dismissed in limine with no order as to costs. (J.P.DEVADHAR,J.) (V.C.DAGA,J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan