In Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Indisabgul Corpn, the High Court (1996) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Issue: Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? -------------------------------------------------------------- COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Versus INDISABGUL CORPN -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR MANISH R BHATT for Petitioner SERVED for Respondent No.
Decision: This reference is disposed of accordingly with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
INCOME TAX REFERENCE No 13 of 1994
For Approval and Signature:
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE B.C.PATEL and
MR.JUSTICE R.R.JAIN
============================================================
1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed
to see the judgements?
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not?
3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy
of the judgement?
4. Whether this case involves a substantial question
of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution
of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder?
5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge?
--------------------------------------------------------------
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
Versus INDISABGUL CORPN -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance:
MR MANISH R BHATT for Petitioner
SERVED for Respondent No. 1
-------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE B.C.PATEL and
MR.JUSTICE R.R.JAIN
Date of decision: 11/07/96
ORAL JUDGEMENT
�At the instance of the Revenue, the following question is referred to this Court under Section 256 (1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 :-
question is referred to this Court under Section 256 (1)
"Whether, the Appellate Tribunal is right in law and on facts in directing the Income-tax Officer
to allow depreciation and investment allowance on the cost of building, plant and machinery respectively without deducting the amount of subsidy received by the assessee from the Government against these assets ?"
2.�The Tribunal decided the controversy following the decision of this Court in the case of CIT vs. Grace Paper Industries Pvt. Ltd. reported in (1990) 183 ITR 591. This case is also covered by the decision of the Apex Court in the case of CIT vs. P.J. Chemicals, reported in 210 ITR 830. Hence, the question is required to be answered against the Revenue and in favour of the Assessee. Accordingly, we answer the question in favour of the Assessee and against the Revenue. This reference is disposed of accordingly with no order as to costs.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.