Case LawHigh Court › Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Jyoti Swit...

Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Jyoti Switchgears Ltd

High Court 04 Oct 2001 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Jyoti Switchgears Ltd
Date of order
04 Oct 2001
Assessment year(s)
1981-82, 1979-80
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Jyoti Switchgears Ltd, the High Court (2001) decided the matter.

Issue: Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX Versus JYOTI SWITCHGEARS LTD. -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: 1.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
INCOME TAX REFERENCE No 125 of 1987 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE M.S.SHAH and Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX Versus JYOTI SWITCHGEARS LTD. -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: 1. INCOME TAX REFERENCE No. 125 of 1987 MR BB NAIK with MR MR BHATT for Petitioner No. 1 MR MJ SHAH for Respondent No. 1 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE M.S.SHAH and MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA Date of decision: 04/10/2001 ORAL JUDGEMENT (Per : MR.JUSTICE M.S.SHAH) �In this reference at the instance of the reference, the following question is referred for our opinion in respect of assessment year 1981-82 :- "Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the royalty payment of Rs.22,67,697/- to M/s Jyoti Limited is allowable in law as a revenue deduction ?" 2.�We have heard Mr BB Naik, learned counsel for the revenue and Mr Manish J Shah, learned counsel for the respondent-assessee. 3.�The learned counsel point out that the controversy raised herein is concluded in favour of the assessee by the decision dated 1.2.2000 of this Court in Income-tax Reference Nos. 250 and 389 of 1984 in case of this very assessee for assessment year 1979-80. 4.�In view of the aforesaid decision, our answer to the question referred for our opinion is in the affirmative i.e. in favour of the assessee and against the revenue. �The reference accordingly stands disposed of with no order as to costs. �����(M.S. Shah, J.) �����(D.A. Mehta, J.) sundar/-
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan