Commissioner Of Income Tax v. K S Lokhand Wala Family Trust

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD INCOME TAX REFERENCE No 113 of 1987 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE M.S.SHAH and Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO @ COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXVersus K S LOKHAND WALA FAMILY TRUST -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: 1. INCOME TAX REFERENCE No. 113 of 1987 MR MANISH R BHATT for Petitioner No. 1 SERVED BY RPAD - (N) for Respondent No. 1 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE M.S.SHAH and MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA Date of decision: 20/09/2001 ORAL JUDGEMENT (Per : MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA) �The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Ahmedabad Bench `B' has referred the following question for our opinion:- "Whether the Appellate Tribunal is right in law in confirming the view taken by the Appellate Assistant Commissioner that the assessment framed on the assessee should be on substantive basis instead of protective basis ?" 2.�The assessee is a trust. The assessment of the assessee-trust was computed on protective basis and it was held that the income was to be assessed substantively in the hands of one Shri Faridahmed Abdulsamad, the Managing Trustee of the trust. The C.I.T. (Appeals) and the Tribunal held that the assessee-trust had to be assessed on substantive basis, and not the Managing Trustee. 3.�In the case of the Managing Trustee in Income Tax Reference No.202 of 1986 on 13th August, 2001, we have declined to answer the question raised in that reference in view of the facts not being clear in the said reference. In light of this position, we decline to answer the question referred in the present reference. 4.�The Reference is disposed of accordingly with no order as to costs. �����(M.S. Shah,J) �����(D.A. Mehta,J) zgs/-