Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Kantilal P Patel

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD INCOME TAX REFERENCE No 146 of 1993 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE M.S.SHAH and Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Versus KANTILAL P PATEL -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: 1. INCOME TAX REFERENCE No. 146 of 1993 Mr AKIL KURESHI with MR MANISH R BHATT for Petitioner NOTICE SERVED for Respondent -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE M.S.SHAH and MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA Date of decision: 18/09/2001 ORAL JUDGEMENT (Per : MR.JUSTICE M.S.SHAH) �In this reference at the instance of the revenue, the following question is referred for the opinion of "Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Appellate Tribunal was right in law in holding that the assessee was entitled to deduction for expenses at the rate of 40% on the incentive bonus commission received by him from his employer, viz. LIC of India ?" 2.�We have heard Mr Akil Kureshi, learned counsel for the revenue. Though served, none appears for the respondent-assessee. 3.�The learned counsel for the revenue fairly points out that the controversy raised herein is concluded by the decision of this Court in CIT vs. Kiranbhai H Shelat, (1999) 235 ITR 635. 4.�Having gone through the order of the Tribunal and having perused the aforesaid decision, we find that the Tribunal was right in holding that the assessee was entitled to deduction for expenses at the rate of 40% on the incentive bonus commission received by him from his employer viz. LIC of India. �We accordingly answer the question in the affirmative i.e. in favour of the assessee and against the revenue. 5.�The reference accordingly stands disposed of with no order as to costs. �����(M.S. Shah, J.) �����(D.A. Mehta, J.) sundar/-