Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Kutch Oil & Allied Industries Pvt Ltd
High Court
24 Jul 1999 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Kutch Oil & Allied Industries Pvt Ltd
Date of order
24 Jul 1999
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Kutch Oil & Allied Industries Pvt Ltd, the High Court (1999) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Issue: Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO Nos.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
INCOME TAX REFERENCE No 330 of 1984
For Approval and Signature:
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE B.C.PATEL and Sd/-
MR.JUSTICE M.C.PATEL Sd/-
============================================================
1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO
to see the judgements?
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO
3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO
of the judgement?
4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO
of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution
of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder?
5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO
Nos. 1 to 5 No
-----------------------------------------------------------
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
Versus
KUTCH OIL & ALLIED INDUSTRIES PVT LTD
--------------------------------------------------------------
Appearance:
MR MANISH R BHATT for Petitioner
NOTICE SERVED for Respondent No. 1
--------------------------------------------------------------
CORAM : MR.JUSTICE B.C.PATEL and
MR.JUSTICE M.C.PATEL
Date of decision: 24/07/1999
ORAL JUDGEMENT
�The following two questions are referred.
1. "Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal
was justified in law in holding that the
assessee was in industrial company under
section 2(8)(c) of the Finance Act,1974
and entitled to benefit of concessional
rate of tax ?"
2 "Whether, the finding of the Tribunal
that the activity of the assessee of
pulversing Bentonite was an industry
within the meaning of section 2(8)(c) of
the Finance Act,1974 and hence the
assessee was an industrial company is
correct in law sustainable from the
material on records ?"
�The assessee in the instant case was given
benefit earlier of the provision for which reference was
made before this Court. The similar questions were
raised before the Court as Tribunal took the view in
favour of the assessee earlier. The decision reported in
the case of Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. M/s.Kutch Oil
& Allied Industries (1949) P.Ltd. reported in 163 ITR
Pg.237 has answered the questions in favour of the
assessee and against the revenue. As the same questions
have been answered by the Court earlier, our answer would
be the same as already answered. Hence, we answer the
questions in affirmative in favour of the assessee and
against the revenue. No order as to cost.
���---
m.m.bhatt
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.