In Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. M G Doshit, the High Court (1997) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Issue: Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? -------------------------------------------------------------- COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX Versus M G DOSHIT -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR MIHIR JOSHI WITH MR MANISH R BHATT for Petitioner MR K.H.
Decision: The reference stands disposed of accordingly with no order as to costs. ---- */Mohandas
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
INCOME TAX REFERENCE No 45 of 1987
For Approval and Signature:
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE R.K.ABICHANDANI and
MR.JUSTICE A.R.DAVE
============================================================
1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed
to see the judgements?
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not?
3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy
of the judgement?
4. Whether this case involves a substantial question
of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution
of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder?
5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge?
--------------------------------------------------------------
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
Versus
M G DOSHIT
--------------------------------------------------------------
Appearance:
MR MIHIR JOSHI WITH MR MANISH R BHATT for Petitioner
MR K.H. KAZI, for respondent
--------------------------------------------------------------
CORAM : MR.JUSTICE R.K.ABICHANDANI and
�� MR.JUSTICE A.R.DAVE
Date of decision: 22/12/97
ORAL JUDGEMENT (Per R.K.Abichandani,J.)
�The following question of law arises for our
determination:-
1. "Whether, the Tribunal is right in law and on
facts in holding that the addition of Rs.
12,335/- being the share income from the firm of
M/s. Bhaishanker Kanga and Girdharlal was not
justified?"
�Identical question was considered in assessee's
own matter and opinion was rendered in I.T.R No. 378/83 decided by this Bench on 12.12.97. For the reasons recorded in that judgement, the above question is answered in the affirmative in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue. The reference stands disposed of accordingly with no order as to costs.
----
*/Mohandas
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.