Case LawHigh Court › Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. M G Doshit

Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. M G Doshit

High Court 22 Dec 1997 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. M G Doshit
Date of order
22 Dec 1997
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. M G Doshit, the High Court (1997) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Issue: Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? -------------------------------------------------------------- COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX Versus M G DOSHIT -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR MIHIR JOSHI WITH MR MANISH R BHATT for Petitioner MR K.H.

Decision: The reference stands disposed of accordingly with no order as to costs. ---- */Mohandas

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD INCOME TAX REFERENCE No 45 of 1987 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE R.K.ABICHANDANI and MR.JUSTICE A.R.DAVE ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? -------------------------------------------------------------- COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX Versus M G DOSHIT -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR MIHIR JOSHI WITH MR MANISH R BHATT for Petitioner MR K.H. KAZI, for respondent -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE R.K.ABICHANDANI and �� MR.JUSTICE A.R.DAVE Date of decision: 22/12/97 ORAL JUDGEMENT (Per R.K.Abichandani,J.) �The following question of law arises for our determination:- 1. "Whether, the Tribunal is right in law and on facts in holding that the addition of Rs. 12,335/- being the share income from the firm of M/s. Bhaishanker Kanga and Girdharlal was not justified?" �Identical question was considered in assessee's own matter and opinion was rendered in I.T.R No. 378/83 decided by this Bench on 12.12.97. For the reasons recorded in that judgement, the above question is answered in the affirmative in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue. The reference stands disposed of accordingly with no order as to costs. ---- */Mohandas
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan