In Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Manharlal G Doshit, the High Court (1997) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Issue: Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? -------------------------------------------------------------- COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX Versus MANHARLAL G DOSHIT -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR MIHIR JOSHI WITH MR MANISH R BHATT for Petitioner MR K....
Decision: The reference stands disposed of accordingly with no order as to costs. ---- */Mohandas
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
INCOME TAX REFERENCE No 132 of 1995
For Approval and Signature:
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE R.K.ABICHANDANI and
MR.JUSTICE A.R.DAVE
============================================================
1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed
to see the judgements?
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not?
3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy
of the judgement?
4. Whether this case involves a substantial question
of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution
of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder?
5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge?
--------------------------------------------------------------
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
Versus
MANHARLAL G DOSHIT
--------------------------------------------------------------
Appearance:
MR MIHIR JOSHI WITH MR MANISH R BHATT for Petitioner
MR K.H. KAZI, for respondent
--------------------------------------------------------------
CORAM : MR.JUSTICE R.K.ABICHANDANI and
�� MR.JUSTICE A.R.DAVE
Date of decision: 22/12/97
ORAL JUDGEMENT (Per R.K.Abichandani,J.)
�The following two questions of law arise for our
determination:-
1. "Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of
the case, the assessee could be said to have
created a valid settlement so as to divert his
share of income from M/s. Bhaishankar Kanga &
Girdharlal and the income therefore could not be
subject to tax in individual assessment of the
assessee?"
2. "Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances
of the case, the Tribunal has been right in law
in holding that the share of profit from M/s.
Bhaishanker Kanga and Girdharlal could not be
subjected to tax in the hands of the assessee
individual on the basis of that the share was
settled in a trust?"
�Identical questions were considered in assessee's
own matter and opinion was rendered in I.T.R No. 378/83
decided by this Bench on 12.12.97. For the reasons
recorded in that judgement, both the above questions are
answered in the affirmative in favour of the assessee and
against the Revenue. The reference stands disposed of
accordingly with no order as to costs.
----
*/Mohandas
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.