Case LawHigh Court › Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Manharlal...

Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Manharlal G Doshit

High Court 22 Dec 1997 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Manharlal G Doshit
Date of order
22 Dec 1997
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Manharlal G Doshit, the High Court (1997) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Issue: Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? -------------------------------------------------------------- COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX Versus MANHARLAL G DOSHIT -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR MIHIR JOSHI WITH MR MANISH R BHATT for Petitioner MR K....

Decision: The reference stands disposed of accordingly with no order as to costs. ---- */Mohandas

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD INCOME TAX REFERENCE No 132 of 1995 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE R.K.ABICHANDANI and MR.JUSTICE A.R.DAVE ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? -------------------------------------------------------------- COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX Versus MANHARLAL G DOSHIT -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR MIHIR JOSHI WITH MR MANISH R BHATT for Petitioner MR K.H. KAZI, for respondent -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE R.K.ABICHANDANI and �� MR.JUSTICE A.R.DAVE Date of decision: 22/12/97 ORAL JUDGEMENT (Per R.K.Abichandani,J.) �The following two questions of law arise for our determination:- 1. "Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the assessee could be said to have created a valid settlement so as to divert his share of income from M/s. Bhaishankar Kanga & Girdharlal and the income therefore could not be subject to tax in individual assessment of the assessee?" 2. "Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal has been right in law in holding that the share of profit from M/s. Bhaishanker Kanga and Girdharlal could not be subjected to tax in the hands of the assessee individual on the basis of that the share was settled in a trust?" �Identical questions were considered in assessee's own matter and opinion was rendered in I.T.R No. 378/83 decided by this Bench on 12.12.97. For the reasons recorded in that judgement, both the above questions are answered in the affirmative in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue. The reference stands disposed of accordingly with no order as to costs. ---- */Mohandas
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan