Case LawHigh Court › Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Market Com...

Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Market Committee, Ratia

High Court 24 Feb 2011 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Market Committee, Ratia
Date of order
24 Feb 2011
Assessment year(s)
2005-06
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Market Committee, Ratia, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATCHANDIGARH. I.T.A. No.829 of 2010 Date of decision: 24.2.2011 Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Market Committee, Ratia. -----Appellant. -----Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOELHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL Present:-Mr. Yogesh Putney, Sr.Standing Counselfor the appellant. --- ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, J. This appeal has been preferred by the revenue underSection 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short, “the Act”)against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, NewDelhi in I.T.A. No.467/Del/2008 for the assessment year 2005-06proposing following substantial question of law:- “Whether on the facts and in the circumstancesof the case, the learned ITAT was justified in holdingthat the expenditure of Rs.80,92,270/- claimed tohave been contributed to HSAM Board under statutoryobligation by virtue of Section 27 of the PunjabAgricultural Produce Market Act, 1961 is allowablewithout appreciating that no evidence could beproduced by the assessee to prove that suchexpenditure was actually incurred and whether such contribution can be treated to fall within the ambit ofapplication of income for charitable purposes asdefined in section 2(15) of the Income-tax Act?” Learned counsel for the revenue fairly states that thematter is covered against the revenue by order of this Court dated5.7.2010 in I.T.A. No.151 of 2010 CITv. Market Committee,Narwana. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. (ADARSH KUMAR GOEL) JUDGE February 24, 2011ashwani ( AJAY KUMAR MITTAL ) JUDGE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan