In Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Mithila Properties Pub.&Contr, the High Court (2012) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: This restoration petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
5
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNAMiscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.922 of 2009
======================================================
Commissioner Of Income Tax
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
Mithila Properties Pub.&Contr.
.... .... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance :For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Archana Sinha For the Respondent/s : Mr.
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVA KIRTI SINGH
and
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN
ORAL ORDER
(Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVA KIRTI SINGH)
10-07-2012 prays to withdraw this restoration petition.
In view of office note, learned counsel for the petitioner
Prayer is allowed. This restoration petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Shiva Kirti Singh, J)
BKS/-
(Vikash Jain, J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue