Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Mithila Properties Publication
High Court
26 Feb 2013 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · patnahcucisdb94
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Mithila Properties Publication
Date of order
26 Feb 2013
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Mithila Properties Publication, the High Court (2013) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNAMiscellaneous Appeal No.292 of 2004
====================================================== Commissioner Of Income Tax
.... .... Appellant/s
Versus
Mithila Properties Publication
.... .... Respondent/s
======================================================
with
Miscellaneous Appeal No.293 of 2004
====================================================== Commissioner Of Income Tax .... .... Appellant/s Versus Mithila Properties & Contract
.... .... Appellant/s
.... .... Respondent/s
======================================================
with
Miscellaneous Appeal No.295 of 2004
======================================================
Commissioner Of Income Tax
.... .... Appellant/s
Versus
Mithila Properties Publication
.... .... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Appellant/s : Mr. Harshwardhan Prasad, Adv.
Mrs. Archna Sinha, Adv.
For the Respondent/s : M/s R.Usha, Adv.
( In all three cases).
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA
and
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEYORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA)
Learned counsel for the appellants submits that
11
26-02-2013
all the three Miscellaneous applications have become
infructuous.
They are accordingly, disposed of.
(Navin Sinha, J)
(Shivaji Pandey, J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.